Mainecat

Paul Manafort shared 2016 polling data with Russian employee, according to court filing

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

1. why would mannafort be sharing this polling data with russians

2. why would trump be trying to stop the mueller report from getting to the public

go....

 

Slinger, it was his employee..FFS

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Rigid1 said:

Slinger, it was his employee..FFS

I said that 5 times already and slinger has ignored it every time.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

ah, so we have sheeple in this country. agreed. now we are getting somewhere. sheeple vote, right? 

i read the writing on this paths wall your first reply...  yes sheeple vote and many of them voted for an admitted felon===  HRC.  and some here still think she didnt commit any such felonies. now who are the real sheep?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Rigid1 said:

Slinger, it was his employee..FFS

more like an associate, prior to the election, working on ukraine matters. here are three important things i'd like you to address

1. who was this person, and what relationship does he have with the kremlin?

2. why would this person and other russian cronies be interested in this information?

3. why would manafort lie about it?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Poor slinger

:lol:

1-PICTURE-1-donkey-and-carrot-Copy.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

How fucking gay do you have to be to have your world turned upside down by polling data :lol: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

more like an associate, prior to the election, working on ukraine matters. here are three important things i'd like you to address

1. who was this person, and what relationship does he have with the kremlin?

2. why would this person and other russian cronies be interested in this information?

3. why would manafort lie about it?

 

 

Who gives a fuck about any of your questions.  The goal was to beat Hillary by any means possible.  Mission Accomplished.  Thanks Trump.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, AKIQPilot said:

Who gives a fuck about any of your questions.  The goal was to beat Hillary by any means possible.  Mission Accomplished.  Thanks Trump.  

Yup. Same reason the DNC was working with foreign agents to collect opposition research 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

more like an associate, prior to the election, working on ukraine matters. here are three important things i'd like you to address

1. who was this person, and what relationship does he have with the kremlin?

2. why would this person and other russian cronies be interested in this information?

3. why would manafort lie about it?

 

 

1. dont know...Link to your proof or give your opinion

2. dont know... Link to your proof on how this helped Trump win the election or give your opinion

3. don't know... Link to why he did lie or give your opinion

 

there ya go.. your turn..:pc:

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, AKIQPilot said:

Who gives a fuck about any of your questions.  The goal was to beat Hillary by any means possible.  Mission Accomplished.  Thanks Trump.  

:lol:

 

3 minutes ago, Rigid1 said:

1. dont know...Link to your proof or give your opinion

2. dont know... Link to your proof on how this helped Trump win the election or give your opinion

3. don't know... Link to why he did lie or give your opinion

 

there ya go.. your turn..:pc:

lots what i thought, and why i call you an idiot at times. you don't know shit, don't care to learn shit, yet come in here and talk shit..

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Snoslinger said:

:lol:

 

lots what i thought, and why i call you an idiot at times. you don't know shit, don't care to learn shit, yet come in here and talk shit..

 

well lets hear your answers??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Rigid1 said:

well lets hear your answers??

1. Konstantin Kilimnik, a Russian business associate with ties to Russian intelligence

2. likely because they wanted to know what states they should focus on with their propaganda. there is no valid excuse that they'd want this information. if you have any options, i've been asking to hear them.

3.. because he knew it was incriminating

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Rod Johnson said:

Yup. Same reason the DNC was working with foreign agents to collect opposition research 

opposition research is legal. colluding with a foreign, hostile, government to win an election is not the same. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

opposition research is legal. colluding with a foreign, hostile, government to win an election is not the same. 

Well sure a good thing that never happened hey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

1Konstantin Kilimnik, a Russian business associate with ties to Russian intelligence

2. likely because they wanted to know what states they should focus on with their propaganda. there is no valid excuse that they'd want this information. if you have any options, i've been asking to hear them.

3.. because he knew it was incriminating

:dunno:

I dare you to call a Ukranian a Russian to his face.

Screenshot_20190111-110940_Chrome.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

1. Konstantin Kilimnik, a Russian business associate with ties to Russian intelligence

2. likely because they wanted to know what states they should focus on with their propaganda. there is no valid excuse that they'd want this information. if you have any options, i've been asking to hear them.

3.. because he knew it was incriminating

1.Kilimnik is believed by CNN and The New York Times to be "Person A" listed in court documents filed by the Special Council against Manafort....:lol:

 

2. Trump focused on states that could go either way, Hillary took them for granted they were her's..Thats the end of that, Its well documented, and Hillary's camp admitted that..

 

3. you could be right or you could be wrong..He wasnt charged with anything to do with Kilimnik, so im going with wrong..

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, DAVE said:

:dunno:

I dare you to call a Ukranian a Russian to his face.

Screenshot_20190111-110940_Chrome.jpg

You know who got intel from Russian operatives? Hillary. But that’s ok tho :lol: 

and he wonders why everyone here says he acts like democrat is his religion 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, DAVE said:

:dunno:

I dare you to call a Ukranian a Russian to his face.

Screenshot_20190111-110940_Chrome.jpg

:lol:

i'm sure he'd be insulted. maybe you should have read more, or did  you just not post it? 

Early life[edit]

Kilimnik was born in 1970 at Kriviy Rikh, Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine, Soviet Union.[4] Fluent in Russian and Ukrainian before his service in the Soviet Army,[4]he became fluent in Swedish and English as a linguist[4] at the Military University of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation,[5][6] which trained interpreters for the Soviet Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU).[7] He served in the Soviet Army as a translator and worked closely with the Soviet Army's GRU.[4] He took Russian citizenship after the dissolution of the Soviet Union.[7] He worked in Sweden as an interpreter for a Russian arms dealer.[7] In Moscow, Kilmnik then worked for the International Republican Institute (IRI) from 1995 to early 2005.[4][7] According to anonymous sources, when applying for his position with the IRI, he responded to the question about how he learned English by stating that the "Russian military intelligence" taught him and he became known among Moscow political operatives as "Kostya, the guy from the GRU".[4] He was dismissed after the Federal Security Service's chief gave a speech discussing internal private meetings at the Institute.[7]

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Rigid1 said:

1.Kilimnik is believed by CNN and The New York Times to be "Person A" listed in court documents filed by the Special Council against Manafort....:lol:

 

2. Trump focused on states that could go either way, Hillary took them for granted they were her's..Thats the end of that, Its well documented, and Hillary's camp admitted that..

 

3. you could be right or you could be wrong..He wasnt charged with anything to do with Kilimnik, so im going with wrong..

weak, very weak. just admit collusion and be done with it. if hillary had 1/100th of the russian shit that we have on trumpy you'd have been all over it. don't deny it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, DAVE said:

:dunno:

I dare you to call a Ukranian a Russian to his face.

Screenshot_20190111-110940_Chrome.jpg

Lmao really you are this dumb

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

Lmao really you are this dumb

surely it didn't take you this long to see it? my god. did you see his comments about hush money this morning? :lol:

 

Edited by Snoslinger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Snoslinger said:

weak, very weak. just admit collusion and be done with it. if hillary had 1/100th of the russian shit that we have on trumpy you'd have been all over it. don't deny it. 

Collusion exists! You just need to have faith in the DNC!! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Snoslinger said:

weak, very weak. just admit collusion and be done with it. if hillary had 1/100th of the russian shit that we have on trumpy you'd have been all over it. don't deny it. 

Dude, its documented and admitted Hillary and the DNC paid a British agent for a fake dossier to hurt Trump in the campaign.. Even the Repubs backed away from it because it was so wrong...:lol:

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Rigid1 said:

Dude, its documented and admitted Hillary and the DNC paid a British agent for a fake dossier to hurt Trump in the campaign.. Even the Repubs backed away from it because it was so wrong...:lol:

 

 

:lol:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Snoslinger said:

:lol:

 

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.