Snoslinger Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 I love how you rw morons have killed all your “dems want open borders” claims all by yourselves. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 Barriers..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEFF Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 Russia Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted January 8, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 8, 2019 collusion Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted January 8, 2019 Author Share Posted January 8, 2019 Uranium one But hillary Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 Just now, Snoslinger said: Uranium one But hillary Poor dumb dumb slinger....did you land under gunfire too? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted January 8, 2019 Author Share Posted January 8, 2019 Tell us about dems wanting open borders Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 3 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: Tell us about dems wanting open borders So you dont now? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 Yes, the Democrats Are for Open Borders FacebookTwitterGoogle+EmailPrint By Mark Krikorian on November 27, 2018 Although Democrats routinely deny that they're for open borders — dismissing the very suggestion as an outrageous slur — their reaction to Sunday's violence by some of the Central American illegal aliens in Tijuana suggests otherwise. If Democrats criticize DHS for trying to prevent storming of the border, and for responding to attacks on its agents with non-lethal crowd-control measures like tear gas, then what border-control measures can they possibly be for? The border clash was the culmination of a series of policy choices by Democrats over the past several years, asymptotically approaching open borders. Although things are lousy in Central America, it was the Obama administration's reaction to illegal immigration from there that created this flow. By releasing into the United States Central Americans bringing children with them, as well as releasing "unaccompanied" "minors" from Central America who were brought here by smugglers hired by their relatives in the United States, the prior administration created a powerful incentive to head north. As a Salvadoran illegal alien who was released by the Border Patrol after crossing into Texas told my colleague Jerry Kammer in 2014: "We were watching CNN, and they were saying that the United States was giving opportunities to women with children. And since some neighbors of ours had come, we decided to try it." The ruse these illegal immigrants have been using to get released is an asylum claim. Even though the vast majority of the claims are clearly without merit (and half of those released in order to pursue their applications never bother to follow through), the Left, both in and out of government, has encouraged their filing, and the prolongation of cases. Having incentivized the flow of Central American asylum seekers, the Democrats then opposed all the steps needed to prevent asylum from being used as a strategy for illegal immigration — such as amending the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act, overturning the Flores Settlement, raising the bar for a "credible fear" claim (the first hurdle in the asylum process), and funding more detention beds. And the incentives for bogus asylum claims come within the larger context of the Democrats challenging the very idea of enforcing immigration laws. Long before #AbolishICE became a rallying cry for the party's socialist wing, Democratic bigwigs have been saying that no illegal alien should ever be sent home merely because he snuck into the country or overstayed a visa. Nancy Pelosi in 2013 put it very clearly: "If somebody is here without sufficient documentation, that is not reason for deportation." Hillary Clinton said much the same during one of the 2016 primary debates: "Of the people, the undocumented people living in our country, I do not want to see them deported." Likewise with Bernie Sanders, at the same debate; in response to Jorge Ramos's question, "And can you promise not to deport immigrants who don't have a criminal record?" Sanders answered, "I can make that promise." If you will an end, you must will the means to that end. The Democrats have demonstrated that there are no means to achieve the goal of controlled immigration that they are willing to support — not border control to keep unauthorized people from barging in, and not deportation of those who manage to get past the notional borders. For a pedant, that may not qualify as "open borders", in the sense that national frontiers would be completely unmonitored, merely jurisdictional markers showing who picks up the garbage on which side of the line. But it's good enough for government work Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
By Mark Krikorian on November 27, 2018 Although Democrats routinely deny that they're for open borders — dismissing the very suggestion as an outrageous slur — their reaction to Sunday's violence by some of the Central American illegal aliens in Tijuana suggests otherwise. If Democrats criticize DHS for trying to prevent storming of the border, and for responding to attacks on its agents with non-lethal crowd-control measures like tear gas, then what border-control measures can they possibly be for? The border clash was the culmination of a series of policy choices by Democrats over the past several years, asymptotically approaching open borders. Although things are lousy in Central America, it was the Obama administration's reaction to illegal immigration from there that created this flow. By releasing into the United States Central Americans bringing children with them, as well as releasing "unaccompanied" "minors" from Central America who were brought here by smugglers hired by their relatives in the United States, the prior administration created a powerful incentive to head north. As a Salvadoran illegal alien who was released by the Border Patrol after crossing into Texas told my colleague Jerry Kammer in 2014: "We were watching CNN, and they were saying that the United States was giving opportunities to women with children. And since some neighbors of ours had come, we decided to try it." The ruse these illegal immigrants have been using to get released is an asylum claim. Even though the vast majority of the claims are clearly without merit (and half of those released in order to pursue their applications never bother to follow through), the Left, both in and out of government, has encouraged their filing, and the prolongation of cases. Having incentivized the flow of Central American asylum seekers, the Democrats then opposed all the steps needed to prevent asylum from being used as a strategy for illegal immigration — such as amending the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act, overturning the Flores Settlement, raising the bar for a "credible fear" claim (the first hurdle in the asylum process), and funding more detention beds. And the incentives for bogus asylum claims come within the larger context of the Democrats challenging the very idea of enforcing immigration laws. Long before #AbolishICE became a rallying cry for the party's socialist wing, Democratic bigwigs have been saying that no illegal alien should ever be sent home merely because he snuck into the country or overstayed a visa. Nancy Pelosi in 2013 put it very clearly: "If somebody is here without sufficient documentation, that is not reason for deportation." Hillary Clinton said much the same during one of the 2016 primary debates: "Of the people, the undocumented people living in our country, I do not want to see them deported." Likewise with Bernie Sanders, at the same debate; in response to Jorge Ramos's question, "And can you promise not to deport immigrants who don't have a criminal record?" Sanders answered, "I can make that promise." If you will an end, you must will the means to that end. The Democrats have demonstrated that there are no means to achieve the goal of controlled immigration that they are willing to support — not border control to keep unauthorized people from barging in, and not deportation of those who manage to get past the notional borders. For a pedant, that may not qualify as "open borders", in the sense that national frontiers would be completely unmonitored, merely jurisdictional markers showing who picks up the garbage on which side of the line. But it's good enough for government work
Snoslinger Posted January 8, 2019 Author Share Posted January 8, 2019 (edited) i'm going to tell you this one more time you inbred dumb fuck. read this several times, slowly if necessary..... my views on the border have not changed. i want them patrolled, fenced, monitored with drones, etc. christ if a portion of it needs a traditional wall, by all means do it. that is NOT what trump wanted. he wants a solid wall across the entire border, and he wanted mexico to pay for it. i feel it is a waste of time, money, and will continue to be a money pit going forward. it will also not solve the vast majority of illegal immigration, drugs, or any other "emergency" trumps thinks of. now fuck off with all the lame talking points. i'm done with you on this topic. Edited January 8, 2019 by Snoslinger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted January 8, 2019 Author Share Posted January 8, 2019 and BTW, the dems have the same thoughts as i do and are willing to supply the funds for it. nobody wants an open border, moron. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 15 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: i'm going to tell you this one more time you inbred dumb fuck. read this several times, slowly if necessary..... my views on the border have not changed. i want them patrolled, fenced, monitored with drones, etc. christ if a portion of it needs a traditional wall, by all means do it. that is NOT what trump wanted. he wants a solid wall across the entire border, and he wanted mexico to pay for it. i feel it is a waste of time, money, and will continue to be a money pit going forward. it will also not solve the vast majority of illegal immigration, drugs, or any other "emergency" trumps thinks of. now fuck off with all the lame talking points. i'm done with you on this topic. Now you want a wall!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 Slinger is glued to CNN! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member steve from amherst Posted January 8, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 8, 2019 17 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: i'm going to tell you this one more time you inbred dumb fuck. read this several times, slowly if necessary..... my views on the border have not changed. i want them patrolled, fenced, monitored with drones, etc. christ if a portion of it needs a traditional wall, by all means do it. that is NOT what trump wanted. he wants a solid wall across the entire border, and he wanted mexico to pay for it. i feel it is a waste of time, money, and will continue to be a money pit going forward. it will also not solve the vast majority of illegal immigration, drugs, or any other "emergency" trumps thinks of. now fuck off with all the lame talking points. i'm done with you on this topic. The entire border? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 its a proven fact you fucks want as many votes as possible legal or illegal. You want ppl dependent on government to live. Fuck your open borders. Trump is going to put the kibosh on you fuckers. youll get nothing other than a wall and like it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Jimmy Snacks Posted January 8, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 8, 2019 7 minutes ago, Pete said: its a proven fact you fucks want as many votes as possible legal or illegal. You want ppl dependent on government to live. Fuck your open borders. Trump is going to put the kibosh on you fuckers. youll get nothing other than a wall and like it. Good god you are an angry idiot.🤣 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted January 8, 2019 Author Share Posted January 8, 2019 54 minutes ago, steve from amherst said: The entire border? wherever it is necessary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted January 8, 2019 Author Share Posted January 8, 2019 11 minutes ago, Pete said: its a proven fact you fucks want as many votes as possible legal or illegal. You want ppl dependent on government to live. Fuck your open borders. Trump is going to put the kibosh on you fuckers. youll get nothing other than a wall and like it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snoslinger Posted January 8, 2019 Author Share Posted January 8, 2019 hey dopo, look around the site. some of your buddies have shown all kinds of proof dems do not want open borders. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xtralettucetomatoe580 Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 20 minutes ago, Pete said: its a proven fact you fucks want as many votes as possible legal or illegal. You want ppl dependent on government to live. Fuck your open borders. Trump is going to put the kibosh on you fuckers. youll get nothing other than a wall and like it. Holy fuck you are one stupid angry Reeetard. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 2 hours ago, Snoslinger said: Tell us about dems wanting open borders you do if you don't want a physical structure what do you call it ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ez ryder Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 28 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: hey dopo, look around the site. some of your buddies have shown all kinds of proof dems do not want open borders. then why are,you so opposed,to closing them ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member steve from amherst Posted January 8, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 8, 2019 41 minutes ago, Snoslinger said: wherever it is necessary. And how much do you think we should spend on that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anler Posted January 8, 2019 Share Posted January 8, 2019 Just curious.. How do illegals vote? I dont see how it is possible where I live so how is this happening? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member steve from amherst Posted January 8, 2019 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted January 8, 2019 6 minutes ago, Anler said: Just curious.. How do illegals vote? I dont see how it is possible where I live so how is this happening? It isn't possible. Sure one could really do a lot of legwork and find a dead due that is still on voter reg rolls. Then get an id in their name. Then risk getting tossed out of the country for something that had virtually no personal gain to one doing it. It isn't happening. People do vote sometimes in 2 places . Others vote where some feel they shouldn't. But those are American citizens . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.