Jump to content

3% of scientists know where the money is


Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, jtssrx said:

 

though this item is superficially “true” in the sense that the words quoted above were indeed written by John Coleman, the statement that they “refute” global warming (i.e., prove it to be false) is something of an exaggeration. As Coleman’s critics have noted, he did not hold a degree in climatology or any related discipline, nor did he study or conduct any research in that field; he merely parroted arguments advanced by others:

It appears that In Trump world opinion equals facts. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

though this item is superficially “true” in the sense that the words quoted above were indeed written by John Coleman, the statement that they “refute” global warming (i.e., prove it to be false) is something of an exaggeration. As Coleman’s critics have noted, he did not hold a degree in climatology or any related discipline, nor did he study or conduct any research in that field; he merely parroted arguments advanced by others:

It appears that In Trump world opinion equals facts. 

 

 

When your sides facts continue to be wrong....are they really facts?

:lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DAVE said:

When your sides facts continue to be wrong....are they really facts?

:lol:

When they prove the earth isn’t round then you and your fellow deniers can claim a victory. 

Until then you are as dumb as the people that think smoking is healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

When they prove the earth isn’t round then you and your fellow deniers can claim a victory. 

Until then you are as dumb as the people that think smoking is healthy.

Whose denying? The earths climate has always changed.

Your side thinks it just started....

Now thats dumb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DAVE said:

Whose denying? The earths climate has always changed.

Your side thinks it just started....

Now thats dumb.

Weren’t scientists the ones who told you about the past climate cycles?  So you believe that consensus from science but choose not to believe the consensus that mankind  putting 83 billion tons of CO2 into the air per year has an effect.  Now that’s dumb.  

Edited by XC.Morrison
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, XC.Morrison said:

Weren’t scientists the ones who told you about the past climate cycles?  So you believe that consensus from science but choose not to believe the consensus that mankind  putting 83 billion tons of CO2 into the air per year has an effect.  Now that’s dumb.  

Who made money off of the pasts climates?

Oops

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, revkevsdi said:

Who continues to make money convincing gullible people like you that mmgw is a hoax?

Who continues to make money convincing gullible people like you that mmgw is real?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...