Mainecat Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 http://www.businessinsider.com/these-6-corporations-control-90-of-the-media-in-america-2012-6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 This movie was played yesterday. YAWN. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted September 15, 2016 Author Share Posted September 15, 2016 1 hour ago, Zambroski said: This movie was played yesterday. YAWN. This one has actual facts and figures Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 3 minutes ago, Mainecat said: This one has actual facts and figures Ahhh....so I see. Well then...I'll take a looky see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 And remember who signed the telecommunications act that set this in motion... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
motonoggin Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 15 minutes ago, motonoggin said: That cannot be. The Clintons only do things that benefit themselves. Errrr....wait, it just may be possible. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 15, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 15, 2016 (edited) 2 hours ago, Mainecat said: This one has actual facts and figures So how does the SC control the money here MC? Why do those corporations have the right to spend a endless stream of money to change public opinion but our little corporations don't? The Citizens United Court reasoned that “differential treatment of media corporations and other corporations cannot be squared with the First Amendment and there is no support for the view that the Amendment's original meaning would permit suppressing media corporations' free speech.” https://www.cga.ct.gov/2010/rpt/2010-R-0124.htm I find it hilarious that the people against the CU decision cannot see this. Boggles the mind really. Edited September 15, 2016 by Highmark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted September 15, 2016 Share Posted September 15, 2016 25 minutes ago, Highmark said: So how does the SC control the money here MC? Why do those corporations have the right to spend a endless stream of money to change public opinion but our little corporations don't? The Citizens United Court reasoned that “differential treatment of media corporations and other corporations cannot be squared with the First Amendment and there is no support for the view that the Amendment's original meaning would permit suppressing media corporations' free speech.” https://www.cga.ct.gov/2010/rpt/2010-R-0124.htm I find it hilarious that the people against the CU decision cannot see this. Boggles the mind really. Because they have blinders on. The have been programmed so that they think CU only helped big corporations. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.