Mainecat Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 (edited) This Newsweek story is too long to copy and paste but it will set Trump back quite a bit in the polls over the next month. http://www.newsweek.com/2016/09/23/donald-trump-foreign-business-deals-national-security-498081.html Edited September 14, 2016 by Mainecat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 Irony and hypocrisy. All wrapped up in a nice little package. Thanks MC! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 24 minutes ago, Mainecat said: This Newsweek story is too long to copy and paste but it will set Trump back quite a bit in the polls over the next month. http://www.newsweek.com/2016/09/23/donald-trump-foreign-business-deals-national-security-498081.html 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 Suddenly the Liar is concerned about national security.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted September 14, 2016 Author Share Posted September 14, 2016 I really didnt think anyone on the right here would read it. Its a huge story that has a major impact on the election. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rw06GT Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 No. It won't. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 1 minute ago, Mainecat said: I really didnt think anyone on the right here would read it. Its a huge story that has a major impact on the election. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted September 14, 2016 Author Share Posted September 14, 2016 Major news story. Very factual....I know it does not have the allure of Clintons sneezes or that her side steps might indicate ALS or some other debilitating disease. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 1 minute ago, Mainecat said: I really didnt think anyone on the right here would read it. Its a huge story that has a major impact on the election. Yes, it's pretty good stuff. I also read the "prequel" story to it. It was much much deeper. Did you see it? It just about had the same title. "How the Clinton Foundation's Foreign Business Ties have Upended U.S. National Security" 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted September 14, 2016 Author Share Posted September 14, 2016 1 hour ago, Zambroski said: Yes, it's pretty good stuff. I also read the "prequel" story to it. It was much much deeper. Did you see it? It just about had the same title. "How the Clinton Foundation's Foreign Business Ties have Upended U.S. National Security" You never read the topic I posted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 6 minutes ago, Mainecat said: You never read the topic I posted. Why would anyone read leftist drivel from newsweak posted by a proven liar /Hypocrite? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 Just now, Mainecat said: You never read the topic I posted. CORRECTAMUNDO!. The title and poster (you), pretty much identified it as a rhetoric piece designed to If I am wrong about that, then I apologize. But, if it makes you feel any better....I've already read up on the subject. Comparatively speaking (Clintons), there isn't really much to this. Just another speculative media editorial piece parading itself as news. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 2 minutes ago, Zambroski said: CORRECTAMUNDO!. The title and poster (you), pretty much identified it as a rhetoric piece designed to If I am wrong about that, then I apologize. But, if it makes you feel any better....I've already read up on the subject. Comparatively speaking (Clintons), there isn't really much to this. Just another speculative media editorial piece parading itself as news. Every democrat on this site seems to be fed information designed to do just that, stir up the pot and create a divide. Do any of you democrats realize the stuff you are being fed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 (edited) 4 minutes ago, racer254 said: Every democrat on this site seems to be fed information designed to do just that, stir up the pot and create a divide. Do any of you democrats realize the stuff you are being fed? Man, I'd say it's some really good grub too for it to be gobbled down with this amount of excitement......like an ugly, fat porn actress trying to break into the porn biz. I don't know any "lefties", can somebody find a lib and smell their breath? I have a feeling is smells like cat shit. Edited September 14, 2016 by Zambroski 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Platinum Contributing Member Highmark Posted September 14, 2016 Platinum Contributing Member Share Posted September 14, 2016 Somehow this is worse than the Clinton pay for play thru the White House when Billy was POTUS to Hillary's time at State and the Clinton Foundation. Thanks MC your hypocrisy always brings a smile to my face. Merriam-Webster will be in touch soon. They need a picture to go with the definition of hypocrite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mainecat Posted September 14, 2016 Author Share Posted September 14, 2016 1 hour ago, Zambroski said: CORRECTAMUNDO!. The title and poster (you), pretty much identified it as a rhetoric piece designed to If I am wrong about that, then I apologize. But, if it makes you feel any better....I've already read up on the subject. Comparatively speaking (Clintons), there isn't really much to this. Just another speculative media editorial piece parading itself as news. 1 hour ago, Zambroski said: Yes, it's pretty good stuff. I also read the "prequel" story to it. It was much much deeper. Did you see it? It just about had the same title. "How the Clinton Foundation's Foreign Business Ties have Upended U.S. National Security" So you lied then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepr2 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 Just now, Mainecat said: So you lied then. Glass houses etc,,,,,, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
racer254 Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 The clinton support group is in full defense mode right now. Look at how all the stories are defined. They are all in retaliation to topics where the clintons have issues with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 Just now, Mainecat said: So you lied then. Well, yes. Some may call it satire or sarcasm though. What does Bernie call it? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elkhorn Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 I stopped at no evidence of illegal activities.. It's all speculation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momorider Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 8 minutes ago, Elkhorn said: I stopped at no evidence of illegal activities.. It's all speculation Its apparent that Thrillery has ZERO self awareness, what about her conflict of interest with the Clinton foundation 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zambroski Posted September 14, 2016 Share Posted September 14, 2016 20 minutes ago, Elkhorn said: I stopped at no evidence of illegal activities.. It's all speculation Exactly, like I posted... Just another speculative media editorial piece parading itself as news 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.