Jump to content

Hundreds of Canadian children held in immigration detention, report shows


Recommended Posts

48 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said:

Perhaps, but we clearly don’t have a zero tolerance policy towards separating families.  That’s you guys thanks to Trump.

 

You keep getting smacked down but coming back for more.    Not here, well maybe, perhaps, but we.....  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, F3600 said:

You keep getting smacked down but coming back for more.    Not here, well maybe, perhaps, but we.....  

Wut?

Our policy has no resemblance to yours at all.

Sorry if that makes you sad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ICEMAN! said:

Perhaps, but we clearly don’t have a zero tolerance policy towards separating families.  That’s you guys thanks to Trump.

Own it

 

Others are Canadian citizens who are forced to choose between separating from parents who have been detained by immigration authorities or living in detention with their parents as de facto detainees. Those who stay with their parents still face family separation, in that they are held with their mother and have limited visits during the day with their father.

Own it?

I love it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ICEMAN! said:

But they get to stay with their parents

:owned:

 

2 hours ago, Highmark said:

 Canadian children were held at the Toronto Immigration Holding Centre alone

 

42 minutes ago, ICEMAN! said:

Wut?

Our policy has no resemblance to yours at all.

Sorry if that makes you sad

Shut up Stoopid :bc:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ArcticCrusher said:

Should he have separated them instead?

No my point was that he’d be taking the selfie with them.

11 minutes ago, Rw06GT said:

 

 

Shut up Stoopid :bc:

We don’t have a zero tolerance forced separation policy no matter how you try and draw some false equivalence here.

SBYL

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ICEMAN! said:

No my point was that he’d be taking the selfie with them.

We don’t have a zero tolerance forced separation policy no matter how you try and draw some false equivalence here.

SBYL

 

Splitting hairs.. you guys suck balls.. your second rate.. stay the hell out of my country

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ATOMIC PUNK said:

Splitting hairs.. you guys suck balls.. your second rate.. stay the hell out of my country

It’s not splitting hairs at all, sorry.

Theres a very big difference

:bc:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Highmark said:

    Oops.   In Canada they detain children who are citizens when their parent was detained.  

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/hundreds-of-canadian-children-held-in-immigration-detention-report-shows/article34117189/

JOE FRIESENDEMOGRAPHICS REPORTER
PUBLISHED FEBRUARY 23, 2017UPDATED MAY 17, 2018

More than 200 Canadian children have been held in immigration detention in recent years, according to a new report from the University of Toronto's International Human Rights Program.

Between 2011 and 2015, 241 Canadian children were held at the Toronto Immigration Holding Centre alone, according to the report. Normally Canadian citizens cannot be subject to detention under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. These children became de facto detainees because they were in the care of a parent who was detained and is a foreign national or permanent resident. The children cannot, however, have their own detention review hearings. As a result they become "legally invisible," according to the report.

"It's a clear violation of international law for these kids not to have their best interests taken into account as a primary consideration," said Hanna Gros, the report's author and a senior fellow at the University of Toronto. "It's quite shocking that Canadian citizens are treated this way."

Did you read the story you stupid fucking Trump apologist?  240 since 2011 and held with their parents. Can you see the difference?

this story is proof that there is no god. If there was everyone who defended this practice would spontaneously combust. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...