Jump to content

A Higher Loyalty


Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

Trump is his own worst enemy. If he didn’t fire Comey there wouldn’t be this book right now.

 

He’s a self made billionaire and you’re president tho? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

He’s a 5 time loser with less than you have in your pocket. A total paper asshole.

umm he won the presidency winner winner chicken dinner.

your girl?

2 time loser

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Mileage Psycho said:

You have brought up the Moscow hookers and I always kind of dismissed that as some leftwing nonsense, well Comey writes that Trump was obsessed with that story :lol: 

it's really not that hard to believe, especially after the stormy daniels stuff, the fact that hookers were interacting with trump at the event where it took place, and he'd get his rocks off watching someone insult the obamas (what the peeing was supposedly about).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Mainecat said:

He’s a 5 time loser with less than you have in your pocket. A total paper asshole.

You meen has a self made billionaire and beet the most qualified presidential candidate of all time?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ZamHammer said:

Amazon is heading up more too.  Glad I nabbed some of that when it tanked!  Thanks Trumpy.....I may end up with a free Jeep on that buy!  :bc:

 

What?  No cashable GIC's like the betamaster?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
2 hours ago, ATOMIC PUNK said:

trump is smaller than comey expected.

Trump has half moon eyes from tanning lmao

This aught to be good..

Everything he complains about Trump is exactly how he acts in this book.  Hypocrite of the highest order.  

Comey was fired for just cause.   Rosenstein and other former high ranking DoJ officials thought he should be canned for the way he handled the Clinton investigation.  Now he comes out with a book trying to harm the President.   And people say Trump is childish.  

Memorandum for the Attorney General

FROM: Rod J Rosenstein

SUBJECT: Restoring public confidence in the FBI

The Federal Bureau of Investigation has long been regarded as our nation's premier federal investigative agency. Over the past year, however, the FBI's reputation and credibility have suffered substantial damage, and it has affected the entire Department of Justice. That is deeply troubling to many Department employees and veterans, legislators and citizens.

The current FBI Director is an articulate and persuasive speaker about leadership and the immutable principles of the Department of Justice. He deserves our appreciation for his public service. As you and I have discussed, however, I cannot defend the Director's handling of the conclusion of the investigation of Secretary Clinton's emails, and I do not understand his refusal to accept the nearly universal judgment that he was mistaken. Almost everyone agrees that the Director made serious mistakes; it is one of the few issues that unites people of diverse perspectives.

The director was wrong to usurp the Attorney General's authority on July 5, 2016, and announce his conclusion that the case should be closed without prosecution. It is not the function of the Director to make such an announcement. At most, the Director should have said the FBI had completed its investigation and presented its findings to federal prosecutors. The Director now defends his decision by asserting that he believed attorney General Loretta Lynch had a conflict. But the FBI Director is never empowered to supplant federal prosecutors and assume command of the Justice Department. There is a well-established process for other officials to step in when a conflict requires the recusal of the Attorney General. On July 5, however, the Director announced his own conclusions about the nation's most sensitive criminal investigation, without the authorization of duly appointed Justice Department leaders.

Compounding the error, the Director ignored another longstanding principle: we do not hold press conferences to release derogatory information about the subject of a declined criminal investigation. Derogatory information sometimes is disclosed in the course of criminal investigations and prosecutions, but we never release it gratuitously. The Director laid out his version of the facts for the news media as if it were a closing argument, but without a trial. It is a textbook example of what federal prosecutors and agents are taught not to do. 

In response to skeptical question at a congressional hearing, the Director defended his remarks by saying that his "goal was to say what is true. What did we do, what did we find, what do we think about it." But the goal of a federal criminal investigation is not to announce our thoughts at a press conference. The goal is to determine whether there is sufficient evidence to justify a federal criminal prosecution, then allow a federal prosecutor who exercises authority delegated by the Attorney General to make a prosecutorial decision, and then - if prosecution is warranted - let the judge and jury determine the facts. We sometimes release information about closed investigations in appropriate ways, but the FBI does not do it sua sponte.

Concerning his letter to the Congress on October 28, 2016, the Director cast his decision as a choice between whether he would "speak" about the FBI's decision to investigate the newly-discovered email messages or "conceal" it. "Conceal" is a loaded term that misstates the issue. When federal agents and prosecutors quietly open a criminal investigation, we are not concealing anything; we are simply following the longstanding policy that we refrain from publicizing non-public information. In that context, silence is not concealment.

My perspective on these issues is shared by former Attorneys General and Deputy Attorneys General from different eras and both political parties. Judge Laurence Silberman, who served as Deputy Attorneys General under President Ford, wrote that "it is not the bureau's responsibility to opine on whether a matter should be prosecuted." Silberman believes that the Director's "Performance was so inappropriate for an FBI director that [he] doubt the bureau will ever completely recover." Jamie Gorelick, Deputy Attorney General under President George W. Bush, to opine that the Director had "chosen personally to restrike the balance between transparency and fairness, department from the department's traditions." They concluded that the Director violated his obligation to "preserve, protect and defend" the traditions of the Department and the FBI.

Former Attorney General Michael Mukasey, who served under President George W Bush, observed the Director "stepped way outside his job in disclosing the recommendation in that fashion" because the FBI director "doesn't make that decision". Alberto Gonzales, who also served as Attorneys General under President George W Bush, called the decision "an error in judgement." Eric Holder, who served as Deputy Attorneys General under President Clinton and Attorneys General under President Obama, said that the Director's decision "was incorrect. It violated long-standing Justice Department policies and traditions. And it ran counter to guidance that I put in place four years ago laying out the proper way to conduct investigations during an election season." Holder concluded that the Director "broke with these fundamental principles" and "negatively affected public trust in both the Justice Department and the FBI".

Former Deputy Attorneys General Gorelick and Thompson described the unusual event as "real-time, raw-take transparency taken to its illogical limit, a kind of reality TV of federal criminal investigation," that is "antithetical to the interests of justice".

Donald Ayer, who served as Deputy Attorneys General under President HW Bush, along with former Justice Department officials, was "astonished and perplexed" by the decision to "break[] with longstanding practices followed by officials of both parties during past elections." Ayer's letter noted, "Perhaps most troubling… is the precedent set by this departure from the Department's widely-respected, non-partisan traditions."

We should reject the departure and return to the traditions.

Although the President has the power to remove an FBI director, the decision should not be taken lightly. I agree with the nearly unanimous opinions of former Department officials. The way the Director handled the conclusion of the email investigation was wrong. As a result, the FBI is unlikely to regain public and congressional trust until it has a Director who understands the gravity of the mistakes and pledges never to repeat them. Having refused to admit his errors, the Director cannot be expected to implement the necessary corrective actions.

Edited by Highmark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Highmark said:

Everything he complains about Trump is exactly how he acts in this book.  Hypocrite of the highest order.  

 

don't disagree but the president acted like a teenage girl so any retribution he gets from these people is on him.  Treat others with respect even when you disagree and maybe you won't have them out there trying to fuck you back.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
27 minutes ago, Angry ginger said:

don't disagree but the president acted like a teenage girl so any retribution he gets from these people is on him.  Treat others with respect even when you disagree and maybe you won't have them out there trying to fuck you back.  

Not that Trump hasn't with some others but what personal attacks did Trump throw at Comey?   His looks?   His marriage?   Maybe I'm wrong but please point out the personal attacks Trump did to Comey that went beyond his job performance.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coney is a MFING hero.  I wish the line wasn't so long to lick his boots.

Do people actually read this shit or just buy it to leave conspicuously lying about?

Sorry, I didn't expect you so soon, let me just tidy up this copy of (sniff*)  Higher Loyalty.

OMG......I hate trump too!  :bc:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You want to be a perpetually self loathing life loser that’s looking for a reason why you’re a failure? Read comeys book.

you want to learn something about how to be successful? Read trumps book. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Platinum Contributing Member
On 4/13/2018 at 8:29 AM, Snoslinger said:

it's really not that hard to believe, especially after the stormy daniels stuff, the fact that hookers were interacting with trump at the event where it took place, and he'd get his rocks off watching someone insult the obamas (what the peeing was supposedly about).

 

:snack:

CCB74722-FB57-4548-81B7-4F5E1A8CA281.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol

×
×
  • Create New...