Jump to content

This goes hand and hand with my question to Snowrider


Recommended Posts

Schweizer: ‘There Are More Emails’ About the Clinton Foundation, State Dept ‘Doing the Bidding of the Clintons’

On Wednesday’s broadcast of the Fox News Channel’s “Kelly File,” Breitbart editor at large and author of “Clinton Cash” Peter Schweizer stated that there are more emails pertaining to the Clinton Foundation that will come out and that “The State Department’s not doing the bidding of the American people. They’re doing the bidding of the Clintons, and it has to stop.”

 

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

 

Schweizer said newly-released emails regarding the Clinton Foundation are “further confirmation to what we’ve been talking about for more than a year, that there’s been pay to play at the Clinton State Department related to the Clinton Foundation, and the Clintons have failed to deal with any of the substance of these issues.”

He added, “I know there are more emails. There are emails that are being produced almost on a weekly basis for both Judicial Watch and Citizens United. You have Julian Assange saying that we’re probably going to see more emails. Look, here’s the bottom line, and you saw a little bit of it today with the State Department, but the media has to hold Hillary Clinton accountable and ask her to answer these questions. Here’s why this is so troubling. This is not a typical money in politics story. We’re used to Wall Street, oil companies, etc., giving donations to politicians, getting access, but federal law prevents foreign businessmen and governments from doing so. The Clinton Foundation is a gateway around that.”

Schweizer concluded, “[L]ook, you talk to Judicial Watch and Citizens United, the State Department is fighting tooth and nail to prevent any emails from coming out. Federal judges are forcing them to do this. The State Department’s not doing the bidding of the American people. They’re doing the bidding of the Clintons, and it has to stop. And God bless these federal judges for forcing them to release this material.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No offense, but why do you care?

He has never claimed to be non-partial or anything but a hard line lefty.

The one thing he is completely honest about is supporting anyone with a D after their name, no matter what.

There is no surmountable amount of evidence you could compile to make him admit she is a liar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Cold War said:

No offense, but why do you care?

He has never claimed to be non-partial or anything but a hard line lefty.

The one thing he is completely honest about is supporting anyone with a D after their name, no matter what.

There is no surmountable amount of evidence you could compile to make him admit she is a liar.

I like making him show himself to be a full on retard 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Trying to pay the bills, lol



×
×
  • Create New...