Jump to content

f7ben

USA Contributing Member
  • Posts

    62,984
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    178

Everything posted by f7ben

  1. As much of a faggot as Erin is ….he at least got covid 100% correct. I’d vote for him over the retards here
  2. Has forced induction , has a turbocharger , not designed to make a single hp more than the motor without all that stuff ISNT FUCKING TURBOCHARGED
  3. I’m just here to troll until all you faggots kill yourselves!!!! Then when there’s no faggots left I’ll get back to serious posting!!!
  4. You take idiotic positions arguing with me and I enjoy rubbing your retarded nose in it. It passes time while I have nothing better to do
  5. Absolutely shocking that Carin would use such a pathetic source !!!
  6. Crazy how wrong you were and that you still won’t admit it …. Insane actually
  7. Well , listening to mainstream news or the government is a guaranteed 200% way to end up wrong so I guess I’d prefer people do their own research.
  8. Strange that they call it a wastegate. I guess if they are venting it to atmosphere that definition could fit. Typically it would be dumped back to the intake side of the compressor wheel and would be a recirc system like what’s used in many cars instead of a bov
  9. You’re too fucking stupid to understand what one atmosphere means. If you examine the definition of normalizing it’s easy to extrapolate what charging would mean and it’s exactly as I stated it.
  10. I didn’t really start the argument
  11. It wouldn’t be a wastegate on the charge side. I’m sure some type of electronically controlled recirculating valve exists in some sc setups but it’s not common or commercially used
  12. I just think it’s an easy thing to delineate. Using a turbo to maintain sea level power is normalizing. Using a turbo to exceed sea level power is charging. Almost anyone with an aircraft background would agree with that.
  13. Yes absolutely , but if you don’t “charge” it beyond sea level manifold pressure all you’ve done to the engine is normalize it.
  14. I mean it’s simple Are normalizing and charging two distinct things? I think I’ve shown that to be the case and most who haven’t been into airplanes probably wouldn’t have known. If you accept that they are two distinct system designs utilizing largely the same components then it would be correct to describe skidoos original system as normalized and not charged. Also about the only way a supercharger can fail to raise manifold pressure beyond 14.7 psi absolute is if it’s missing the belt lol
  15. Nobody said a normalized engine wasn’t a forced induction design. Of course it’s utilizing forced induction. Just not to the point of exceeding sea level power output.
  16. Except I’m correct and you’re not ….again
  17. I’m simply saying , turbo normalizing and turbo charging are two different things. The terms were put into common industry nomenclature by the aircraft industry who were the pioneers of commercial turbo use. What skidoo did in 2020 is a text book definition of turbo normalizing. What they did in 2021 is a text book definition of turbocharging. It’s not hard to concede
  18. No , that is an example of what that specific company may change. The reason I posted the link was to illustrate they are two distinct designs. Quit being a know nothing dumbfuck retard
  19. You’re dumb as fuck lol and triggered to the max. Poor queef
  20. A turbocharger , how about if I install a turbo and wire the wastegate open so it could never make any boost. Is it still turbocharged or did I just install another muffler?
  21. He’s just too dumb to grasp any of this , much like HSR. Yet here they are arguing anyways.
×
×
  • Create New...